British military intervention in Afghanistan has a chequered history, making it easy to conclude that British forces will fail again
New US approach to Afghanistan insurgency: Vindication for Pakistan?
The Christian Science Monitor
Afghanistan and the US are showing signs of a new approach to
insurgents in Afghanistan. The approach may ultimately allow Pakistan
more influence in Afghanistan as the US prepares to leave next year.
Islamabad, Pakistan — A private meeting recently between a Taliban
figure with ties to the militant Haqqani network and Afghan President
Hamid Karzai may indicate a new willingness to engage with groups
previously thought of as "too extreme," ultimately allowing Pakistan
more room to influence events in Afghanistan as the US prepares to
leave next year.
Maulvi Abdul Kabir, an ex-Taliban governor close to the Haqqani
network, which is widely believed to be the US-led coalition’s most
fierce enemy, met with President Hamid Karzai just over two weeks ago,
the Associated Press reported, citing an unidentified former Afghan
official. The meeting was a precursor to ongoing talks with a 70-member
council tasked with bringing a close to the Afghanistan insurgency.
According to Brigadier (ret.) Mehmood Shah, a former security chief of
Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), Kabir, who was
arrested by Pakistani authorities in February, was likely flown into
Kabul with Pakistan’s approval and backing.
IN PICTURES: Fighting continues in Afghanistan
The United States has publicly insisted that the Haqqani network based
in Afghanistan and Pakistan and led by Jalaluddin Haqqani and his son
Sirajuddin, should be excluded from talks. In July, US Gen. David
Petraeus, commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan, suggested the group
should be blacklisted, a move backed by Sen. Carl Levin, chairman of
the US Senate Arms Services Committee.
The purported meeting with Mr. Kabir, would appear to suggest Afghanistan's desire to take a different direction.
Rifaat Hussain, a militancy expert at the Quaid-i-Azam University, says
there now appears to be “an effort to co-opt all those elements who are
willing to play ball with Karzai, which include the core Haqqani group
and even those who hold a position of influence.”
Such an outcome would be favored by Pakistan, he says, which has long
resisted calls to tackle the Al Qaeda affiliated group in its North
Waziristan base, partly out of fear of a backlash and partly so it may
continue to exert influence by proxy in Afghanistan.
The Pakistani government has called for groups such as the Haqqani
network and the forces of warlorld Gulbuddin Hekmatyar to be included
in peace talks, and as such may view the move by the US to talk to
Kabir as a vindication of its own long-time policy.
“There is a certain duality in the American approach: on the one hand
they are talking to Haqqani and on the other they are also asking
Pakistan to take them on, which Islamabad finds baffling,” Mr. Hussain
“Pakistan favors the government of Afghanistan to talk to the Taliban,
and it would like to facilitate that as much as it can. Maulvi Kabir is
in custody, so the government of Pakistan would have allowed [the
Afghan government] to talk to him,” Brigadier Shah says.
So far, the Pakistan Army has resisted calls to carry out a full blown
attack in North Waziristan, an area where the Pakistan Army currently
has 34,000 troops.
“What we have to do, we have to stabilize the whole area. I have a very
large area in my command. So I must stabilize the other areas, and then
maybe look at North Waziristan” Lt. Gen. Asif Yasin Malik, the main
military commander in the area, told reporters last week.
What rooting out the Haqqanis will do for Pakistan
Operations against the Taliban are still ongoing in three of the seven
Tribal areas, Bajaur, Mohmand, and South Waziristan. The Pakistani
Taliban are waging a campaign of terror in Pakistan’s cities.
“Committing to fight the Haqqanis at this stage could create a serious
internal threat for Pakistan,” says Dr. Hussain, the analyst.
Ultimately, however, it may be the so-called Quetta Shura, which
consists of the Taliban leaders who fled from Afghanistan after the
US-led invasion in 2001, and not the Haqqani network or other
Pakistan-backed warlords who will be crucial to achieving a settlement,
according to Hussain.
The Monitor reported a number of the leadership council were arrested
in February including the Taliban number two, Mullah Abdul Ghani
Baradar, though Pakistan is limiting US and Afghan access to them,
according to Ahmed Rashid, author of “Descent into Chaos.”
“They have the legitimacy of leading the Jihad against the foreign
occupation,” as opposed to the Haqqani network which is politically
weak and unpopular within Afghanistan. “The Quetta Shura is more
independent and wants to assert itself. It does not [want] to appear as
a stooge for the Pakistanis,” he says.